Comments

I think the Microsoft product would be an excellent upgrade for ALL WashU students. After doing some investigation, it seems to have even more functionality than the Google product and more storage space. Also, the Olin community will be able to utilize this product. The reality is people will ALWAYS forward their mail to services of choice. The Microsoft product puts as many students as possible under the umbrella of WashU email; I'm sure some will opt to use other services such as Google or Mac services. If SU decides to go with the Google product, no email forwarding service will be able to integrate with Olin's current email system. I want this change to make everyone better off; I want everyone to have the most email and document storage space possible. I don't just want this to be an Art Sci improvement -- SU is everyone.

I am an olin student, And have a mac. I have my email forwarded to my gmail account and it works perfectly! Gmail is awesome, and it is fairly easy to integrate my outlook into my MAc as well. My outlook is forwarded to my gmail, and my gmail is forwarded to my Entourage program! Its really awesome and i hope that SU chooses to go with G-mail.

I don't know whether this holds true with the @live.edu package, but for hotmail accounts, students actually don't have the *option* of forwarding to other accounts, unless those other accounts are with Microsoft (so no forwarding to Gmail). There is, of course, always the option of using POP/IMAP, although that defeats the purpose of putting everything in one place, as you'd need to log into each site separately to check each email address, unless you happen to be at your own computer. Perhaps @live.edu does not have the same limitation as hotmail here though; that would be worth checking into.

Oh, and now that I think of it, I believe Google said that their product *will* interface with the Microsoft Exchange services Olin uses, including calendar sharing, etc. Although obviously if either package is chosen, it will be replacing Olin's current email system... But either way, students will still have full interaction with faculty using Exchange. Not too much difference between Google and Microsoft here, as far as I know - i'm not a business student, however.

I should have clarified here — I meant that a Hotmail account cannot be forwarded to a Gmail account, and I was concerned that this was the case with live@edu. It appears that live@edu does *not* have this limitation, however, or that it can at least be worked around, as the John Marshall Law School appears to have done. Rest still stands. (Like the poster below me, I also use a Mac and forward to Gmail, so I may be a bit biased, although I also have two accounts with Microsoft :) )

If I have to use microsoft live something very bad will happen.

Agreed!

To the above poster (who probably won't see this): why can Olin not use Google Apps? Olin's current e-mail system will not need to be integrated - it will be gone. All incoming mail to your @wustl.edu addresses will go directly to Google's servers. I'm not sure how they will handle @olin, @artsci, @cec, etc., but I know that it can be done because I've seen it done before. Also, Gmail does support forwarding to other e-mail addresses. Google Apps also has good support on various mobile platforms such as Blackberry, Windows Mobile, iPhone, Android, etc. I understand that the majority of the administration and staff use Exchange, but why does that preclude them from switching? At my internship last summer, the company I worked at had been using Microsoft Exchange with Outlook from the start but they were able to migrate everything to Google Apps fairly easily. Ever since the change, the system has been more reliable and easy to use than ever before. I don't have experience with Live@edu, so I can't speak to how good or bad it is. I do know, however, that based on the statistics that Jeff Nelson collected, the vast majority of students forward their e-mail and out of those, a significant majority forward to Gmail. And based on the testimonials from peer institutions, I think Google Apps is the best option.

I disagree with the above anonymous commenter. I believe that Google Apps is a more fitting choice. Despite the fact that Live@Edu has more space, I don't believe the difference of 7.2GB to 10GB is significant enough to bother 99.99% of actual users; most users will use nowhere near that amount of space, even with attachments. (Frankly, if you need document storage, you use Google Docs or something like Dropbox -- getdropbox.com -- for free, and are more suited for storage and transfer of files than email.) My main concern with Live@Edu is that Microsoft is very well known for not properly implementing cross-browser support in their web applications, with degraded service in browsers such as Firefox, Safari, or Google Chrome. Increasingly, more people use these browsers as they work better and support add-ons (Firefox); having the school email only work with degraded quality in these browsers would be an unnecessary hassle. Google, on the other hand, builds their software to be fully cross-browser, and GMail works in every major browser, as well as text-based and mobile browsers. As well, GMail is frequently updated with a wide variety of very useful extensions that enhance the quality of the email service. Microsoft, however, does not do this. In short, I think Google is a more suitable choice for the students, based upon extensive knowledge and personal experience with the products.

Actually, the Microsoft option, Outlook Live, now supports full functionality across browsers. Safari and Firefox are now fully supported alongside Internet Explorer.  Microsoft just started rolling this out recently.

Glad to hear that, I admit that I wasn't aware (is there a mobile version, too? It isn't obvious from any of their copy). However, I believe my other points still stand.

I also think that the Microsoft solution is the way to go. Document storage through google seems highly limited, as opposed to Microsoft's. This, in addition to the reasons listed above form the basis for my opinion.

I am a student employee who works at one of the IT departments at Wash U. I wish to remain anonymous because I don't want to anger anyone in management. I'd like to draw your attention to priority number 6: integration with the WUSTL Key. I admit I don't have any special knowledge of how either the Google or Microsoft systems work, but from reading their descriptions, what we'd essentially be doing by going with either of those options is outsourcing our e-mail hosting to someone else. All of our e-mail will go through their servers running on hardware that we don't have access to. This will make it impossible, as a technical matter, to integrate the WUSTL key into their use. I'm pretty sure neither Google nor Microsoft will let us make the modifications to their servers necessary to integrate the WUSTL key. Furthermore, by outsourcing our e-mail in this way, we'll be in a position where we have no control over it. I don't think that's a problem from a reliability standpoint, but as our needs change in the future, we'll be left without any flexibility. To that end, I suggest that we move from our current system, where each individual school hosts their own e-mail server and manages it in whatever what they see fit, to a single e-mail system. This will actually make the integrating with the WUSTL key (in addition to getting onto the wireless networks and anything else that currently uses e-mail credentials) infinitely easier and the savings from this centralization may be enough to balance out whatever savings we would get from switching to Google or Microsoft. This has been tried and killed because each IT department jealously guards its turf. We need to just create one central IT department for all the schools and all the systems. This will also have the convenient effect of creating a single student portal for technology problems, another important goal.

Actually, Google Apps allows integration with single sign on protocols. The WUSTL KEY is based on an open source technology called shiboleth. The University can set up an ldap directory and use Google APIs to integrate WUSTL KEY From Google: Integration with Active Directoty/LDAP/Directory Information Services to ease account management and provisioning using our APIs and directory sync tools: Google Apps Directory Sync or Google Apps LDAP sync

Both options that are being considered, Microsoft and Google, support the use of WUSTL Key credentials.

Slightly off-topic, but this is an important point nevertheless:

"All of our e-mail will go through their servers running on hardware that we don't have access to"

I'm not sure everyone will feel comfortable giving a 3rd party access to university email. Regardless of how well known the company is, we are giving them access to an enormous amount of private data.

I'm an engineering student, and I take advantage of Sendmail's ability to automatically forward email to an address specified in the ~/.forward file to forward all my email to my Gmail account. I don't know if this capability is offered by the other schools, but I believe that it is a much better solution to the problem. Those who are interested in using a Gmail account can have everything transparently forwarded to their Gmail account (and use their wustl.edu alias to send/reply to emails, directly from the Gmail interface), while everyone else is free to continue using the university's hosting.

I think it's pretty clear that the easiest course of action would be to just let Google handle it, but I don't think it would be the right one.  When I configured my wustl.edu email account to forward to Gmail, I had to SSH into my account and modify that file by hand. The majority of the student body is not capable of doing that.

Therefore, the best solution is that if there is enough demand among students for Google's email services, the IT departments should simply offer a simple and straightforward way to set up forwarding to Gmail, but not foist it on the entire university population.

I would question the statistics provided for the comparison. After 5 minutes of searching around online i had a sneaky feeling that the 5MB storage cap for google docs is inaccurate. First of all, each of the microsoft doc files can take up to a few hundreds KB, or even up to MB level. a 5MB limit seems to be stupid on google's side. Secondly, I found this google discussion group http://tinyurl.com/ctyvcs which reveals a better picture, quote: "Mukund Do the math: 5000 combined text documents and presentations of 10MB max (presentations) = 50,000 MB 1000 spreadsheets of 1 MB max = 1000 MB 100 PDFs of 10 MB = 1000 MB Total (i theory): 50000+1000+1000 = 52000 MB As Google Docs will undoubtedly compress the files the actual size may vary largely." In addition, Google will convert your microsoft doc files to google's format, which is much smaller and more efficient. I feel that SU did a bad job in this comparison here (blatantly in favor of one side) and I would like to ask the SU to get more statistics and other informations to the student body. I did not do enough research and articulation before writing this response, but I feel like I need to voice my opinion if no one else cares for this. In the long run, I sense that Google Docs will perform better because they have a community based developement team which always brings the state of the art technology, fixes security loopholes much faster, and with a friendlier and friendlier user interface. Not to forget it's always improving.

According to the RFP response from an associate of Google, the education edition comes with 10 GB of total storage for entire domain. I estimated that to come out to about 5 MB of space per user. I understand how that calculation can be misleading, so I have changed the above text to reflect the answer as given in the RFP. Thanks for pointing that out!

Out of curiosity, has there been talks with the Arts & Sciences Computing about how this will affect their department's current operations?

Ken Keller from A&S attends the meetings. I don't want to speak for Ken, but I have not gotten the impression that there is anything about A&S Computing's current operations that would be jeopardized by this initative.

The biggest difference between these two options is not obvious based on specs, but instead is Google's lack of user data privacy protections. Microsoft as a largely enterprise focused operation and due to this has a better commitment to an individuals information security, and a lengthy demonstrable history of this. It is personally my viewpoint, that if the school is to go with the google option, they must provide the option to easily use an alternate source as opposed to this due to the way user information is processed. This would require that all email data be handled by the university for one step in order to provide the end users choice.

What "data privacy protections?" What does Microsoft have in place that Google lacks? Your post is very vague and "hand-wavy."

The gist of what the Google representatives had to say at their presentation was that there is no "lack of user data privacy protections." The guarantee complete data confidentiality/privacy, with a clearly defined set of exceptions:

- If Google is subpoenaed, they have the right to provide information to a court of law.
- Your data can be shared if there is perceived to be a threat to the company. This does NOT mean that Google is parsing through your data looking for suspicious plans, but rather that a school administrator could request a check-up if there are reasonable grounds for suspicion. Note, if the University provided an on-campus data-handling alternative, administrators would STILL have this option, as they currently do. Microsoft would also provide the administration with the means to deal with threats this way — like it or not, it's simply necessary.
- Unlike Microsoft, Google does generate advertisements (this only applies to alumni, not students) based on email content. This is done by real-time iteration over data each time the page loads - no data is shared, stored, or compromised. Microsoft does the exact same thing when using a computer program to filter spam, as do most all mail clients. It's just a memory-less algorithm that looks for keywords and does a one-time useful reaction to them, which does not involve storing, copying, or elsewise sharing your data.
- Google occasionaly brings in partner businesses to do repairs on datastructures. Those companies have basic access to the servers with your data, but they are under the same binding contracts as Google employees, and cannot do anything with your data, give it to others, or send you unsolicited mail. This is really not an issue.

Hope that clears this up some! Feel free to check Google's privacy agreements if you need more details though.

1) Engineering IT (formerly the CEC) is currently exploring options for student email upgrades, as well, and Bob Guthrie (leading the process) has said he has no problem going with a different solution than the rest of the University. I'd get talking with him ASAP if you want uniformity. 2) If Google really provides only 5MB/user that's completely inadequate, at least for engineers. We're routinely sharing ~20MB files over Gmail, and the real need is for something that can handle file sizes in the 100s of MB for collaborative work.

Hey Justin thanks for your comment. Bob Guthrie is on the committee.

I would prefer the gmail application, rather than the microsoft education one. Having used both hotmail and gmail, I far prefer the look of the second one. Also, from speaking to others, many people in the student body already have emails forwarded from their wustl mail to their gmail account.

I wouldn't compare the Google interface to Hotmail.  The Microsoft solution that is being considered is not the one based on Hotmail.  It is called Outlook Live (formerly Exchange Labs). It is a completely different system with a compeletly different look and feel if you access via the web. 

I use Google Apps for all of my devices, including a current Gmail account and Google calendar. I find them extremely well-integrated and easy to use. Furthermore, I know many classmates who also use the Google applications (and none who use Microsoft Live). From a transitioning standpoint, Google would be our preferred selection.

I use Google Apps for all of my devices, including a current Gmail account and Google calendar. I find them extremely well-integrated and easy to use. Furthermore, I know many classmates who also use the Google applications (and none who use Microsoft Live). From a transitioning standpoint, Google would be our preferred selection.

For the love of God, just switch everything over to google.  My fiance is a grad student at SLU.  ALL of SLU goes through gmail apps.  It is so incredibly simple and perfect.  Nothing else compares.  If you know a student at SLU, check out their school email account. It's amazing and it's unthinkable to do anything else.

It's worth mentioning that Google Apps is only free for user accounts, and this is only the basic service. The non-education version of Google Apps is somewhere around $50/user/year (last time I checked). Google, in an effort to make money, recently changed their education discount from something like 70% to something like 20%. In addition, schools may be required, for legal reasons, to purchase additional services to archive all emails for a certain period of time, adding to the cost of the service.

 

My school recently priced out the minimum legally-viable package from Google for the amount of accounts we have, and it came to something in the $80k range (for ~6000 accounts), not a significant savings from the current on-site hosted Exchange system we use now, which only costs $2/user (one-time fee per server version). I would imagine the price for Google Apps would be a bit higher for your campus.

Google E-Mail is incredibly easy to use, just a terrific system.  WashU-- Please switch to Goggle E-Mail!

More capability, more storage, collaboration with Outlook -- the Windows product is a better fit for this campus as a whole!

Google is amazing and has the fewest problems. So easy to use!

Does anyone know if Microsoft's POP3 and mail forwarding policies are the same with the educational package as they are for hotmail accounts? I do know that I've become very frustrated with hotmail, which offers no options for automatic mail forwarding services *except* if the account you're forwarding to is another @live/@hotmail/@msn address, which is a nuisance of a policy in my opinion.

This is less of an issue now, but it was especially inconvenient before Microsoft enabled POP3 for hotmail accounts a mere few months ago. If POP3 will be disabled on educational email accounts for students, that would be a deal-breaker in my opinion - Being able to work through a non-browser-based email client is basically essential to me.

Live@Edu, based on Microsoft Exchange, allows you to access your e-mail via IMAP, POP, EWS, or MAPI (Microsoft Outlook).  So, compared to Hotmail, you have a greater selection of options to use when connecting your e-mail client to Exchange.

I have never had problems with any aspect of google, and it works flawlessly on both PCs and Macs, which will be incredibly valuable for WU students. 

Why can't each of us just make our school email forward to gmail.com and not have to make SU go through the whole business of it?

Currently a lot of students do that, but by going this route lots of other opportunities open up, one of which would be that the university saves money by not hosting the forwarding servers. And it's always good if you can send emails *from* a @wustl.edu account too :)

Additionally, Google and Microsoft both offer fairly expansive applications with the basic email service: chat, website hosting, calendars, document storage, document editing, general storage, the ability to manage multiple email addresses, and synchronization with your phone/pda/whatever. (These services vary between the two venders, however).

It's totally debatable whether students really *need* all of those services, but if you start to look into how it all works (especially the ability to share calendars and collaboratively work on documents) there certainly are some great opportunities that could come from either vender that we don't have now.

Post new comment

  • Sign in using Facebook
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.